U.S. Jesco International LTD. Inc. Trademarks

U.S. Jesco International LTD. Inc. Trademarks

PEEL-A-ROUND

Non-electric hand operated food peeler
Owned by: U.S. Jesco International LTD. Inc.
Serial Number: 75674432

GOURMET CHOP CHOP

Non-electric hand operated food processor for chopping fruits, vegetables and the like
Owned by: U.S. Jesco International LTD. Inc.
Serial Number: 75676097

EURO-GOURMET

Cookware; namely, pots and pans, and Non-electric Pressure Cookers; namely, infusion cookers
Owned by: U.S. Jesco International LTD. Inc.
Serial Number: 75702381

JESCO

Electric massage apparatus
Owned by: U.S. Jesco International LTD. Inc.
Serial Number: 75893250

EURO-SOOTHER

Electric massage apparatus
Owned by: U.S. Jesco International LTD. Inc.
Serial Number: 75893253

JESCO

REFILLABLE BUTANE CIGARETTE LIGHTER not made of precious metal
Owned by: U.S. Jesco International LTD. Inc.
Serial Number: 75893256

JESCO

HOUSEWARES; namely, Non-Flammable Ironing Board Cover pads and Pepper Mill Style Graters, and HOUSEHOLD CLEANING PRODUCTS…
Owned by: U.S. Jesco International LTD. Inc.
Serial Number: 75893790

JESCO

CUTLERY; namely, Paring Knives and Chef Knives; and NON-ELECTRIC hand OPERATED TOOLS AND IMPLEMENTS; namely, food peelers…
Owned by: U.S. Jesco International LTD. Inc.
Serial Number: 75894205

Today on Verdict

The Supreme Court Limbers Up to Aid and Abet Trump’s Coup

UF Levin College of Law professor and economist Neil H. Buchanan describes how the U.S. Supreme Court is readying itself to declare Trump the winner of the election.

If the Challengers Prevail on the Merits of the ACA California v. Texas Case, What is the Appropriate Remedy and What Effect Should the Ruling Have on the Entirety of the ACA? Part Four in a Series

In this fourth of a series of columns examining the California v. Texas case challenging the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Illinois law dean Vikram David Amar, Michigan Law dean emeritus Evan Caminker, and Illinois law professor Jason Mazzone consider what the appropriate remedy should be if the challengers prevail on the merits of the case.

The U.S. Supreme Court Cannot Determine the Election Result

Amherst College Associate Provost Austin Sarat and attorney Daniel B. Edelman argue that there is nothing the Supreme Court can do to prevent governors from certifying slates of electors that actually reflect the vote of the people in their states.